Clarify discussion and voting period rules (#23)
* Clarify discussion and voting period rules
* Fix typo
* Add requirement to link the mailing list archives in the RFC itself
* Drop “Repeated Discussion” remark in “Proposal Initiation”
* Specify that votes may neither start nor end during EOY holidays
* Rename “Minimum Discussion Period” to “Cooldown Period”
* Clarify that removing voting widgets is a major change
* Clarify that RFCs may not change after the vote started
* Clarify that the end date is not included in the voting period
* Soften phrasing for “new discussion points”
* Fix typo
* List phases.
* Describe discussion period behavior.
* Put change types front-and-center explicitly.
* Restructure cooldown period discussion.
* Move pre-discussion description to the Initiation section.
* Reword inactive-proposal section to use bullets.
* Add subsections for easier scanability.
* Restructure voting prerequisites.
* Restructure voting procedure.
* More voting procedure changes.
* Expand Errata section with a section header and more procedures.
* Better explain what voting formalities are.
* Rst Format.
* Refer to the later section for secondary voting details.
* Assorted rewording suggestions from Tim
Co-authored-by: Tim Düsterhus <timwolla@googlemail.com>
* Standardize on 'authors', no parens.
* Additional word cleanup.
* Adjust time descriptions.
* Numeric fixes
Co-authored-by: Tim Düsterhus <timwolla@googlemail.com>
* Further clarify the grace period.
* Rephrase the grace period
Co-authored-by: Tim Düsterhus <timwolla@googlemail.com>
* Capitalize Cooldown Period.
* Additional rewording.
Co-authored-by: Tim Düsterhus <timwolla@googlemail.com>
* Formatting
* Encourage adding notes referring to the errata
* Allow canceling a vote within the first 7 days
---------
Co-authored-by: Larry Garfield <lgarfield@makershub.ai>
Co-authored-by: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
